Related
Items
|
 • Buy this item from our featured Merchant - Featured Price: $27.95
 |
Product Reviews:
Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution--and How It Can Renew America |
Rating: 2 (out of 5)
Summary: Disappointing - a poor work from a likeable author
Comments: The problem with this work is that in order for it to be reasonable,1must accept Mr. Friedman's premise: that the earth is getting hotter, flatter, and more crowded. While it is not a stretch to believe these things, he presents them as an emergency. Without the emergency he initially makes the rest of the book loses its steam. while some aspects of the premise may be true, the attempt to make it alarming diminishes its credibility. The problems I had with the premise were:
1) As far as I have heard, scientific consensus has not totally confirmed global warming, much less our role in it. There is still a significan not list of counter evidence to man made global warming.
2) The earth getting more "flat" as Mr. Friedman likes to put it contrihoweveres only to the appearance of global emergency by allowing previously isolated groups of people to communicate on a minute to minute level. This relatively new ability allows us to share and compare information about economy, weather, resources, population, and other important statistics in an unprecedented way. Our ability to know about all the goings on in the world simultaneously contrihoweveres only to the appearance that more is going on than ever in history, which is not the case. The flattening of the earth has simply made us more aware of what has been going on this whole time.
3) The combination of hot, flat, and crowded does not equal a state of emergency. E generation has crises which, to it, hold the fate of humanity. Crisis exists no more now than ever.
All in all,1has to accept his faulty premises in order for the rest of the book to have any gravity at all. This presented some trouble for me.
Other than a few flaws with the premise Mr. Friedman seems to be conflicted or confused about a few things. Actually quite a few things. These were just the main ones:
1) Is it the job of government or the job of the free market to make the push toward clean energy? Friedman says at several points that government has kept us from moving toward clean energy, only to later say that government should supply the incentive to move in that direction. He at1point claims that "the people are ahead of the government in demand for clean energy" however then claims that "the market must be guided by government policies."
He combines these ideas to say things like "...the only thing that can stimulate this much innovation in new technologies and the radical improvement of existing ones is the free market..." paired with "...you have to intelligently design and fertilize them - with the right taxes, regulations, incentives, and disincentives..."
What I am hearing him say is that we need a free market which is regulated by the government. This makes me wonder if he knows what a free market actually is.
He says things such as lobbyists for coal and oil are purchaseing policy protection from the government, and he now expects governent to act against those who have been paying them. He seems to think that big government will dig us out of the mess that big government maked.
I say great luck to that.
2) Mr. Friedman seems to have little understanding of economics as is evident in the polices he would implement. It is obvious that some of his policies (i.e. price floors for energy)would wreak havoc on the economy (reference Henry Hazlitt for the best explaination of this)and he even makes mention that the policies may do so. He uses the banner of emergency as justification for poor policy: "Some people say it will ruin our economy and is a project we can not afford to do. I'd say it's a project at which we can not afford to fail."
Again, to Mr. Friedman, the state of emergency justifies poor economics, however as I mentioned earlier about the premise, if you do not accept the emergency the plan is unnecessary.
3) It is unclear if the new plan for clean energy is possible or impossible. He seems hopeful, and talks at length about the government policies that would put us in the "right" direction, however also makes it quite evident that the world going green is an overwhelming task that will take generations. Some sources he sites claim that if we are not off fossil fuels by as early as 2012 it will be to late. This is obviously not possible as Mr. Friedman points out. What great, then, will a plan be that is too late to execute? This makes me believe that these "point of no return" dates are scare tactics to invoke panicked votes for policies that the public does not have time to consider; policies that will further empower government.
Apart from the premise and the inconsistent logic, the book was disagreeable for other reasons:
1) The biased nature of the sources he sites. He sites sources known to promote agenda, or at least not promote American interests, to verify the need for his poor economics.
2) The mixmatch of credible quotes, incredible quotes, humorous quotes, and anecdotes makes a situation in which potentially credible information is drown by hearsay and irrelavence. He often uses a single anecdote to attempt to convince the reader of some broad trend somewhere.
3) Some of the quotes in the beginning of chapters were subprime. In the Global Weirding chapter he quotes the comedy paper The Onion, which may be funny however does not strenthen his case. Also, in the chapter proposing how to start the green revolution, he uses a quote by Mao Tse-tung on how to enact a revolution. I do not think the green revolution ought to be accomplished by, or for that matter compared to, any of Chairman Mao's definitions. 1wonders why he chose that particular quote.
Although I do agree with his stance on petrodictatorships, his economic policies for weaning off foreign oil are faulty.
I do agree that effeciency is great, and competing to be greener than others is fine. However, I cannot concede to faulty economic plans and enhanced government control to enact it. Without the cry of emergency, there is no need to resort to such things. The market will turn in that direction of its own accord, as it already has.
All in all, this book raises some awareness of energy efficiency and the direction we should think about heading, which is neither new information nor is it presented better than any other book on the subject. He raises some great questions, then gives poor solutions. He uses entirely too many anecdotes, presents theory as fact, and in a somewhat pompous manner attempts to coin his own phrases.
This was all disappointing since I really enjoyed and agreed with The World is Flat. I hope people do not trust this book just because it has his name on it.
Best
|
Rating: 1 (out of 5)
Summary: Kindle edition lacks usable index
Comments: The Kindle edition of this work lacks a usable index. The index is supplied as a list of terms without section numbers that would correspond to pages. Selecting an index term defines it rather than linking to it. Using search on terms supplies different results than the printed index. For example, in the printed version, the term appliance is qualified with4subcategories that include 15 separate page listings and3multi-page sections. Querying "appliance" using Kindle search returns 9 pages of 53 instances of the term without differentiation or context other than the few words surrounding the search term. In a book presented in electronic format without standardized paging, index terms should be linked to their location inside the text. |
Rating: 5 (out of 5)
Summary: Great and Thought and Action Required Provoking Book!!
Comments: Purchase as a gift for a 20+ yr. old, however this older generation - 60+ thinks it's relevant and demands a response in action. |
Rating: 5 (out of 5)
Summary: Hot, Flat and Crowded
Comments: Friedman has the ability to make the complex seem obvious. Eone who reads his books will develop a different understanding of our impact on the world as a whole. This book is no exception. |
Rating: 5 (out of 5)
Summary: Interesting Look at Petropolitics
Comments: This is an excellent book, however like an earlier reviewer, I believe the future of the sustainable energy industry lies within the private sector, not within the hands of the government. The private sector is more than willing to take the necessary risks in order to make efficient technological products.1thing I do fear is that after 2009, it's possible we might see a Green Energy boom and then bust. Green Energy could well be the next Bubble.
|
|
