
Related Items
|
Buy this item from our featured Merchant - Featured Price: $27.95 |
Product Reviews: Custer's Last Campaign: Mitch Boyer and the Little Bighorn Reconstructed |
Rating: 5 (out of 5) Summary: Excellent account of the Little Bighorn fight Comments: This book is actually in2parts. The 1st half is a biography of sorts of the half Sioux, half white scout Mitch Boyer, who served with various military units on the Plains beginning in the 1850s and ended his life with George A. Custer at the Little Big Horn in June 1876. The second half is a detailed, at some points even minute-by-minute, account of Custer's Last Stand. Examining all the evidence (though disregarding however not totally dismissing the archaeological evidence that was just being made known in the 1980s), John S. Gray reconstructs the last week or so of Custer's campaign, concentrating especially on the afternoon of June 25 when Custer and the Seventh Cavalry met their demise.
A scientific historian, Gray introduces time-motion graphs to depict the movements of troops and Indians on the battlefield. More constructive for me are the itinerary tables that do pretty much the same thing however in a different configuration. Gray theorizes a general counter-clockwise movement of Custer's troops from the Medicine Tail Coulee to Calhoun Hill and eventually to Custer Hill where (Custer's) Last Stand occurred. His interpretation follows pretty much the standard1(challenged more recently by archaeological reports which extends troop movements beyond Custer Hill). He believes the testimony of Indian scout Curley, who had been with Custer right up to the early action on Custer Hill and then left the scene about a half hour before the final moments of the fight, was generally accurate and valid, though misinterpreted by interviewers at the time. Gray must be commended for insisting that what happened during the last half hour of the fight must remain conjecture only, since hardcore evidence is lacking.
It's hard to imagine a more thorough examination of events surrounding this single battle could be made (that will not stop others from trying, I am sure), and Gray's account might be the closest we get to what actually happened (barring the uncovering of future evidence or revelations made by archaeological findings). Too detailed to be one's 1st book on the Little Big Horn fight, it will surely be devoured by anyone with a strong interest and some already acquired background information concerning the battle. An important study, highly endorseed.
|
Rating: 2 (out of 5) Summary: Did I read the right book? Comments: After reading the glowing reviews here on this book, I purchased it and went to work on it. I have to say, this is probably the almost all disappointed I have been in any book in a long time. Yes, the author puts together some impressive time/motion study. And I did gain some insights into both the battle and the causes of the campaign.
However, I found the text dry. MitchMitch was here. Mitch went there. Mitch did this. Mitch did that. I also was overwhelmed with the details of who was where when. In the middle of all this detail the author has a hard time giving you his main point behind all the statistics.
I also did not like the huge number of assumptions on speeds he made to arrive at his conclusions. He may well be correct, however anyone can make a theory fit the facts if they toy with the numbers. What is "trotting speed"? What is trotting speed over rough terrain? What is it uphill vs. downhill? Do units trot constantly or make stops now and then? The whole time/motion study thing left me unconvinced. It is at best a theory.
Surprisingly, a minority of the book was about the battle itself. I realize the author may feel it's already been covered. however his concentration on who was where when left way too many details of the participants unrevealed. It came off as dry. Why did Reno do what he did? Or Benteen? The author made assertions about their motives, however gave relatively little foundation for his assertions, relative to the masses of data on less interesting topics.
I think the author did a great job at what he set out to do. It just wasn't as interesting as I expected. And the lack of detailed battle and campaign maps was disappointing. 1gets lost in all the names of various coulees, ridges, knolls, hills, fords, and other bodies of water.
I found the time/motion graphs difficult to read, with some variables on them not even indicated on the legend. however I did figure them out. I think he could have used a much better layout to show the timeline of events. I kept having to page back to reference previous graphs as he added more information. Past a point the mind can not keep it all organized, and more effective visual aids would have helped.
I was left with many unanswered questions about the battle. Topics such as weapon effectiveness, actual tactics used, etc, he seemed to just ignore in favor of his extensive analysis of who was where at what time.
I have read other books that give much better overlays of what happened and why, however lack the depth of this book. I am hoping to find1that puts it all together. |
Rating: 5 (out of 5) Summary: This is for Rory Coker Comments: This is an outstanding work, and Gray did a great deal of work to piece togather the Indian accounts of the final battle and like his work shows the last stand wasn't on Custer hill, however the rush to the river to escape the attack on Custer hill from behind by2Moon's force.2Moon's account doesn't go into much detail and has to be put togather with the other accounts to know Mitch is the1leading the men towards the river after Tom is killed on the Hill by Rain in the Face. almost all do agree the last soldier standing at the Custer battlefield was Sgt. Bulter. The men rushing to the river and death were for the almost all part E company, Dr. Lord and Mitch Boyer (who was already wounded).
There is only1more mystery of the this battle to be solved and that is the horse found miles away dead and shot in the head by the trooper, with its oat bag full and gear intact (which means someone other than Curly made it out of the battle, which means it had to happen before the final stand and best bet it happen when the horses were chased away from Calhoun and Keogh's command by Crazy Horse's force). |
Rating: 4 (out of 5) Summary: Fascinating account of Custer's Last Stand Comments: Essentially a physicist's interpretation of the Battle of Little Bighorn, author John S. Gray's "Custer's Last Campaign: Mitch Boyer and the Little Bighorn Remade" is a fascinating account of1of the almost all storied battles ever to take place on American soil. And this was a battle, with more than 350 men, women and children killed in the span of2furious hours on the dusty slopes of 1876 southeast Montana.This is not a book for beginners of Custer/Montana lore. It can be tedious at times as Gray utilizes time-motion studies to piece together the puzzle of what happened during the Seventh Calvary's final minutes. Since e man of the U.S. Army was killed during this prong of the battle, there are no eyewitness military accounts. Yes, hundreds of Native Americans survived, however few spoke of this battle for fear of punishment and hatred of Anglo historians. Crazy Horse,1of the few Native American leaders during this confrontation, was assassinated a week after arriving on the reservation. So this important man's account was never taken. Thus, we are left with a hodgepodge of hazy Native American reconstructions. Visiting the battlefield today, which stretches over several miles, solemn white headstones mark the spot where bodies of the Seventh Calvary were found. The location of these stones are included in Gray's complex, mathematical equations. What he's intricately pieced together, with the help of eyewitness accounts, archaeological digs and his own analytical mind, is a realistic result of this unusual battle. His conclusions are perhaps outside of the realm of what people would consider today. The myth surrounding Custer and Little Bighorn has been shaped by such matinee films as "They Died With Their Boots On," "Little Big Man" and television's "Son of the Morning Star." These films portray Custer as headstrong, vain, heroic and, in1case, a tad insane. however each version, thematically forged by the decade it was filmed, portrays Custer fighting gallantly to the last, standing alone in buckskins while angrily firing his pistol at the approaching Native American hordes. Custer, as if performing the concluding act of Shakespeare's "Hamlet," falls dead to the ground in bloody, poetic, slow motion. It makes for a great painting hanging above the neighborhood bar. The reality, revealed by Gray's novel, is Custer did indeed have a battle plan rather than making a vain stab at glory. however his forces were simply overwhelmed, chaos ensued, and panicking men were run down like herds of buffalo. It's not poetic, however has war honestly ever been? To understand I america's fascination with this battle,1must 1st read Evan S. Connell's "Son of the Morning Star,"1of the greatest historical nonfiction novels ever written. Gray discards such weighty wisdom like an old blanket, and scientifically gets to the root of what actually happened. A Last Stand does indeed take place on Custer Hill, where Custer's body was found. Survivors panic, some commit suicide, and Boyer and company frantically run west, fighting and killing in a froth-like animal panic. however west is towards the Native American village they were attacking in the 1st place. They are then desperately cornered in a ravine, a small gully which can be stared at to this day. When the U.S. Army rides into a primitive village, shooting defenseless women and children, the primitive man will fight back if for no other reason than to protect their families. Like poking a stick into an ant hill, Custer and his Seventh Calvary were overwhelmed, the sorry battle ending in a ditch. Men attempted to claw their way out, perhaps asking themselves how they ended up in such a remote location, dying the loneliest of deaths. This battle haunts us for a number of reasons, mainly because of our inhumane treatment of the Native American people. So we obsessively analyze this epic Homerian battle, trying to find a moment of heroism, a brief glimpse to help salve our morally guilty wounds. however all we find in Gray's account is wide-eyed reality, and desperate men crying in a ditch. Gray's novel details these horrors in scientific fashion, and unknowingly supplies a glimpse of the dangers of American warrior vanity. |
Rating: 5 (out of 5) Summary: Fascinating Reconstruction of Custer's Stand Comments: The reader becomes mesmerized and impressed by the thorough and meticulous process of constantly checking witness testimony with known topography and horse/walking/etc. mph rates, then time/motion studies with all possible data examined to see what plausible explanations can be more pushed forward as likely scenarios.At the center here is the infamous Indian scout, Mitch Boyer and the testimony of the young Curly, survivor with Custer. Amazing how the evidence Gray presents turns Custer 180o around from what is historically bantered, an aggressive disobiendent hawkish leader. Gray's reconstruction reveals soldier who emphasized and implemented what orders were given to him, to pin the Indians from left flank escape, and all the time awaiting Benteen's company and I ammo train, which never arrived in time. Disappointed that no chronology chain here shown how the followup takes place to discover the battlefield. Possibly Gray's other books on this subject cover that. Remarkably well written, able to keep this reader's attention easily even with all the careful calculation checks, etc. |
|