Kodak EasyShare DX3500 Digital Camera
2.3 Megapixel, Point and Shoot Camera, 1.8 in. LCD Screen, Weight: 0.45 lb. (0.2 kg)
|
| |
|
| Overall Rating: |
(20 total reviews)
|
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Durability: |  |
| Battery Life: | |
| Photo Quality: | |
| Shutter Lag | |
|
|
|
|
SORT BY:
Review Date  | Product rating
|
Showing 1 - 10 of about 20 Consumer Reviews
|
|
DX 3500
by dirtyernie, Dec 21, 2004
Pros: A durable compact camera, good photo quality.
Cons: None for this type of camera.
The Bottom Line: A Durable digital camera that is easy to use in an everyday enviroment I can trust anyone to use this camera with good results.
Review: This camera is very easy to use. You dont even need to read the instruction's. I will be using this ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
 |
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
|
|
For the average user without having to spend a lot.
by ctanaka1, Aug 6, 2003
Pros: Simple, easy to use, no additional equipment to buy.
Cons: Basic.
The Bottom Line: As a former professional photographer, the 3500 is easy, economical (much so now) and produces good quality photos.
Review: This camera reminds me of the disposable cameras....point and shoot. The quality, up to 8X10 is p ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Kodak DX3500 - Detailed Review
by lojack_ii, Jul 30, 2003
Pros: Great pictures @ 800 size and under, ease of use, value.
Cons: Photos somewhat blurry @ maximum size, No optical zoom, some shutter lag.
The Bottom Line: A great buy for a medium budget. Great value and very crisp picture quality for the price. You should not be disappointed.
Review: I bought this camera after several long weeks of comparison shopping; price checks, review reading, ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
WHAT A DEAL ???KODAK DX 3500 CAMERA
by nuoneonejt, Feb 1, 2003
Pros: So far the pictures I've taken has amazed me on how clear they are
Cons: Batterylife,dock sold separately
The Bottom Line: Get the dock that goes with this. Saves batteries.
Review: I have been wanting to upgrade from another camera I had and my husband called me and told me that W ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
 |
|
|
|
Best Bet
by microscan5528, Jan 5, 2003
Pros: cost,image resolution/quality, software bundle
Cons: cheap plastics do not contribute to solid feel, lack of optical zoom
The Bottom Line: Its a quality, inexpensive digital camera that is worthy of the Kodak name.
Review: We purchased this camera several months ago, intending to to replace an aging 35mm point and shoot. ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
|
Good beginner's camera for the money
by jproland, Dec 26, 2002
Pros: Easy to use, takes great pics for the average user, docking station is great.
Cons: Don't expect to get crisp 8x10's, not a lot of zoom capability
The Bottom Line: Good for the average user who wants a cheap camera without cheap features.
Review: I got this camera last year for Christmas, and I have been happy with it. I feel that this review is ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
|
Kodak DX3500 Great For The Money
by dhahn1, Nov 25, 2002
Pros: Small and easy to handle
Cons: Sometimes difficult to adjust flash
The Bottom Line: For the Money and the quality of photos you get and the megapixels you can't go wrong with the Kodak DX3500
Review: I list alot of items on ebay and when my expensive digital camera quit working and was out of warran ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
|
Good for beginners, but 3600 model is better choice
by jvolzer, Nov 9, 2002
Pros: Easy to use. Feel of a traditional point and shoot. Nice quality pictures.
Cons: No optical zoom. Few settings for shots or for image storage. Battery.
The Bottom Line: Nice camera for the price. Prefer the DX3600 for a little more money to gain some optical zoom capabilities.
Review: This is a good digital camera for someone wanting to get into digital photography. It's easy to use ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
|
Stop! You have found the camera for you
by incoming1084, Oct 15, 2002
Pros: Price, ease of use, lightweight, great pictures, fast transfer time
Cons: No optical zoom, flash can be too bright, review on lcd can be slow
The Bottom Line: I would definitely buy this camera again. It offers over 2 Megapixels, and takes extremely nice photographs. I like this camera and would recommend it to anyone.
Review: I use this camera on a daily basis mainly for candid shots. I was not looking for a professional ca ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
|
Kodak DX3500 Digital Camera
by memas4, Oct 7, 2002
Pros: Easy to use and reasonably priced.
Cons: Pictures sometimes blurry.
The Bottom Line: I would recommend this camera to anyone who is just starting out or who has a limited budget but wants a good camera. I find it easy to use.
Review: I use this camera mostly for placing pictures on auctions and the software is easy to use for transf ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
