Nikon COOLPIX 3700 Digital Camera
3.3 Megapixel, Compact Camera, 1.5 in. LCD Screen, 3x Optical Zoom, With Video Capability, Weight: 0.29 lb. (0.13 kg)
|
| |
|
| Overall Rating: |
(27 total reviews)
|
| Ease of Use: |  |
| Durability: | |
| Battery Life: | |
| Photo Quality: |  |
| Shutter Lag | |
|
|
|
|
SORT BY:
Review Date  | Product rating
|
Showing 1 - 10 of about 27 Consumer Reviews
|
|
Nice camera that's small with lots of functions
by dannos66, Oct 17, 2005
Pros: Good picture quality and functions: Many scenes to choose with manual adjustments, movie, sound.
Cons: Low light flash shots turn out dark if object is more than 10 feet.
Review: This camera is my first digital. After many hours of research to really define what I wanted, I didn ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
 |
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
 |
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Still remains among the top point and shoot 3.2 hard body's out there
by alvin44, Aug 25, 2005
Pros: Superb battery life, hard body design, just enough menu options
Cons: Low light indoor shots need speed adjustments, read your manual it helps greatly
Review: I have owned this camera for over a year now and am impressed to right about it's superb battery li ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Nikon's Unique "Coolpix" Camera
by flipper699, Aug 6, 2005
Pros: Fast lag time, great battery life and fits in your pocket!
Cons: Button layout could be better, crappy lens cover system.
The Bottom Line: It's a great camera for those "Nikon Moments" It gets the job done.
Review: Great Lag time, this is my 3rd digital camera. My last camera was the Canon Elf S200. A small but SL ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
One of the best 3.2MP out there
by sapita, Jun 25, 2005
Pros: Good picture quality. Video with sound. Long-lasting battery. Small...
Cons: Not very good quality pictures at night.
Review: My first Nikon was coolpix 2100. I loved it but felt I needed to improve. The coolpix 3700 was not a ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Great camera for low light indoor work
by wgretter, Mar 25, 2005
Pros: Small size, good image quality, autofocus illuminator, low cost
Cons: Zoom buttons should be on top
Review: Most of the reviews fail to mention that the Nikon 3700 has an autofocus illuminator. This allows it ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Excellent Ultracompact Camera
by rodbell1, Mar 19, 2005
Pros: Ultracompact size, outstanding clarity, ease of use, nice software.
Cons: The only negative I have found is purple objects are too blue.
Review: I was looking for compact size and also good quality pics in a second digital camera. I found it her ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Great camera, Great deal...get one while you can
by hd7crash, Mar 16, 2005
Pros: very small, lots of features, long battery life, inexpensive, built with quality in mind
Cons: turning the flash off makes your photos come out blurry
Review: I purchased one of these as soon as the $100 rebate came out, i ended up paying $160 after finding t ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
A Beautiful Tiny Gem
by yadava, Mar 9, 2005
Pros: Beautiful videos Excellent pictures Smooth Zoom
Cons: The Lithium Ion battery which is hard to find and a bit expensive.
Review: Amazing picture quality Great video quality 30 fps!!!! Big bunch of scene modes. Excellent shutter l ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Great for the price
by johnnyboy22203, Feb 11, 2005
Pros: very small - fits easily in your pocket, lots of features
Cons: picture quality when used w/flash, slow shutter speed, low flash power
The Bottom Line: If you want a cheap camera for snap shots that will easily fit into your pocket, then this is the one. For great picture quality, look elsewhere.
Review: I bought this camera because it was the cheapest 3 megapixel camera I could find. They also had a re ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
 |
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
 |
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
Camera works as advertised
by bobjohn1, Jan 1, 2005
Pros: Good pictures, small size.
Cons: Flimsy battery door
The Bottom Line: I would purchase this camera for it's ease of use and low price.
Review: I bought this camera to replace my aged HP Photosmart p315. After about three months of use, the cam ...
Read full review
|
| Author's Rating: |
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
